Google Earth

The most amazing piece of free software you will ever get. After buying Keyhole, Google has released the product after a long hibernation.

Just like God you can tilt, rotate and zoom into almost any point on US – except maybe destroy and create ;)

Things to do:

Add Layers : Particluarly 3D buildings. 3D builtings have been implemented only for metro cities (like NYC, Seattle). They are just awesome.
Play Tour Put some driving directions and hit PLAY. You now have a helicopter tour from Point A to Point B
Tilt and Rotate - Its no fun to just look from the top, hit tilt and now you can see everything in any prespective.
Drag and Leave - After tilting, drag the map and leave it, you will have a wonderful tour of your neighbourhood.
Update: They have pulled the software back. I have a copy if anyone needs it.

For those of you outside US, here are some US addresses you can play with.
700 5th Ave , Seattle ,WA
144 W 19th St New York, NY 10011

Some US zip codes – 98040 (Mercer Island) 02886 (Warwick, RI)

And if you really want to knock yourself off the chair – checkout the mountains at a prespective. Pick a mountain range in Montana or Rockies – tilt the angle a bit, do a wee bit rotation – and the graphics could easily pass off as the title sequence of CliffHanger – so realistic 3D mountains.

1) go to : West Glacier, mt
2) Zoom out a bit
3) Go north and tilt

Google Earth never stops to amaze me.

Fremont Parade


Yesterday we went to Solstice Parade in Fremont. The parade was X-rated, here are some U rated ones ;)

Microsoft Photoshop ?

Microsoft takes baby steps into a Graphic designers toolbox with Microsoft Acrylic. Will it be the end to Photoshop ? scary but I think not.

Back in 2003, Microsoft quietly acquired a little known graphic software house called “Creative Expressions”, so it got 2 years to massage the code and grow a decent software out of its remains. I am not too much worried about any imminent threat to Photoshop, Macromedia tried once to unseat the king, with its Vector/Bitmap combo tool Fireworks, but failed (and got acquired to boot)

So I am sure Photoshop is here to stay, but I am curious. I am beta-testing this new Microsoft Photoshop beater – full review soon.

GoogleMap Usablity

I read a blog which hails Google Maps, so I thought I’d drop my comment there, but it Blogger asked me to register first to make a comment – so I thought I’d post it here.

Usually graduates from Google Labs are model netizens – clean, white, neatly dressed, not too graphic but perfectly groomed to be usable right out of the box (Froogle, Image Search etc) – but after using Google Maps for a while I was frustrated by some of its responses. Yes, its fast, its easy, its great, it uses AJAX, it has kick ass satellite views… but is it really intuitive and user-friendly?

  1. It needs to default to Driving Directions

    80% of the time you go to an online map site to check driving directions from point A to B, not to gawk at plain old maps. To give out dynamic Driving Directions is its primary use, looking at a Map is its secondary use, so that should be it default.

    Worse still – If you do input a address 1, North First Street, San Jose , CA - and click on DIRECTIONS it wipes out your carefully typed address! Can’t u at least transfer it over in To: field?

  2. Search in context

    Google is smart – no doubt, you input 34/8 it is smart enough to understand it might be a mathematical equation and displays the numerical result. But its cousin is plain dumb.

    If you say get me directions from…

    1, North First Street, San Jose , CA [to]
    2, North First Street

    … it comes back and asks WHERE?? where ? where do you think? its next door dummy! search in context! scan the neighboring zip codes and see if you can find a match… Check the primary city first, then move to the suburbs (upto 200mile radius) and see if that makes sense.

    Agreed, ‘North First Street’ is a pretty common street name, you might find it in:

    Santa Clara, CA (4 miles),
    San Diego,CA (500 miles),
    Austin,TX (2000 miles),
    Miami,FL (3000 miles),
    even London, UK.

    Now, commonsense should dictate that I don’t plan to drive across the Atlantic so London is out, now you have the same street name in a city which is 500 miles, 2000 miles, 3000 miles and 4 miles. So now first check if the address makes sense in the originating city (San Jose), if it is not found in San Jose – move to Santa Clara, CA then offer the other cities as ‘links’ (Did you mean ‘North First Street, San Diego?’).

    But can u guess what Google thought? it thought that I was driving from San Jose to United Kingdom. This is the single response I got

    Did you mean:
    First Street, North Lanarkshire, G71, UK

    Duh! That’s not mighty smart, is it…?

Interpreter

IMDB Plot Outline: Political intrigue and deception unfold inside the United Nations, where a US Secret Service agent (Penn) is assigned to protect an interpreter (Kidman) who overhears an assassination plot.

Sydney Pollack ‘s Interpreter is the first movie to be shot inside the UN Complex in NYC (even Hitchcock was denied permission for his 1959 thriller ‘North by Northwest’), and it stars Nichol Kidman and Sean Penn. Best known for his Tom Cruise thriller “The Firm” (1993) Pollack takes on a script with as many holes as a Mosquito net, but manages to salvage it to a decent nailbiter in the second half.

Hole 1) The plot is about an attempted assassination of an cruel evil African dictator to be staged in UN General Assembly. The characters (Kidman, Penn) don’t care if he lives or dies – and he is portrayed as a evil man, so we as audience don’t care if he lives or dies. We don’t feel sorry for the lead character as she doesn’t seem to be in trouble, and she is not accused of anything – so why do we care what is unfolding in the screen ? Apathy is a deadly sin in Screenwriting.

Hole 2) Implausibility of the plot. With a closed house like UN General Assembly cant the US Secret Service give protection to a visiting Head of State ? Instead they go about stalking the informer (Nicole) and trying to verify her story. If that is indeed the way it works (Where the one giving a tip is investigated) rather than investigating the threat, then it is bound to fail. Again, how believable is it that an assasin is able to smuggle in a semi-automatic into a General Assembly floor ? The same smart ass fails to see throught the obvious double cross ? A man so smart, but he doesn’t have an exit strategy – and pray, how the hell does Nichol know all this before hand and hides inside the ‘Safe room’ – Please!

On the positive side Pollock’s direction is A Grade. The music by M.Night Shymalan regular James Newton is fantastic.

*** (3/5)

Smoking Ban & the audience psyche

News: Indian Censors advocate a Ban on smoking on screen.

Are today’s youth influenced by what they see in the Media (TV, Movies and the Videogames) ? Is Hollywood to blame ?

Well, here is a direct Q&A with Mark Taylor who survived Columbine High School Shooting where many young students were massacred.

Was there a connection between the release of the movie The Matrix and the Columbine shootings?

I fear so! I saw The Matrix at the Sony Theater in downtown Boston the first week of its release. In The Matrix, Neo is wearing a full-length black leather coat. Under the coat he has hidden an array of automatic weapons. He is also carrying duffel bags full of bombs. There are probably more bullets fired than in any previous movie. The bullets are destroying any object in sight. I don’t know what the name Neo is intended to mean.
The Columbine shooting happened the same week. From the description of the killers and the clothing they were wearing, I felt like I reading about a scene from the movie The Matrix. The Columbine killers were wearing full-length black leather coats and their weapons were hidden underneath their coats also. They were carrying duffel bags full of bombs. Had they seen The Matrix?

Maybe Matrix cannot be entirely blamed for for these twisted teens – but it does provided them with a pop culture reference point. Just as easily we can pluck out various examples from history and see how movies have played a part in our lives – Uprisings, Political vendetta, Social Values etc -even how movies were able to shape today’s Romantic symbols long before we were born.

In the early 1920′s after the World War I, Diamond makers were worried sick about the free fall in Diamond prices and that it was no longer considered rare (South African mines were producing diamonds by truckload and flooding the market). They came running to the Motion Picture industry to manipulate the public’s perception.

To romanticize diamonds required subtly altering the public’s picture of the way a man courts — and wins — a woman, they started exploiting the relatively new medium of motion pictures. Movie idols, the paragons of romance for the mass audience, would be given diamonds to use as their symbols of indestructible love. Stars were seen in umpteen photos wearing solitaire diamond rings. Even through the great depression (1929) audience tried to emulate their idols by matching their expensive lifestyle.

It goes to show how powerful media images can re-inforce entire generations. For a stone that is neither a rare, nor the toughest – infact its no tougher than a Ruby or Jade (which is infact tougher) – it holds a high place in the hearts of young women (wish my wife reads this ;) thanks to some clever piece of subconscious marketing 2 generations back, which naturally spilled over generations and reached us, and will continue…

No matter what the actual truth is, a cross section of audiences are subconsciously mere puppets to what is projected to them. They are today’s teens. If a popular hero is shown smoking wearing a shirt collar up with boots strategically placed on a motorbike with its headlights on. You can walk out of the theater and guaranteed to see a college kid standing in a similar pose in front of a girls college. The same is true with women, you can find Kajol Saree, and Karishma Chuddihars.

But some of these perceptions maybe harmless (Cooldrinks or mobile phones), but a few of them are deadly – Guns, Murder and Smoking. Teens are particularly vulnerable as they are moving into an age where they suddenly finding themselves without a character, a void which could be easily filled by mimicking other powerful influences or on-screen persona, say a Rajini or a Neo. These disillusioned copycats think that they can magically transform overnight from zero to hero, just by emulating their hip matinee idols.

But if the industry can guarantee that mature themes (blood, violence, smoking, drinking etc) will only be viewed by mature audience (25+?) then go ahead show it to people who will not easily be swayed – but spare the teens and youth by strictly enforcing the underage Certifications. Or maybe there should be an untold rule that at least Heroes don’t smoke, so that a negative trait firmly in place for the act.

There is a reason why a Shah Rukh Khan can sell 1000s of Santro’s by posing near it, or a Sachin can boost Boost. We are a nation who follow celebrities like demi-gods (in some cases Gods) – be it good or bad.

But all said and done this Ban will not produce immediate effects on our youth – but our kids will thank us.

Montana!

This Memorial day weekend I got a chance to get back to one of my fav places in US – the Montana backcountry. The scenery has to be seen to be believed. I have never seen so much natural beauty packed in such a small geographic area.

The weather was bad – it was bright & sunny! maybe good for a tan – but it ruins photography with its deep shadows, haze and harsh light. Last year during my visit we had a magical weather – cloudy skies & rain sprinkles which resulted in a perfect mix of muted soft light and moody atmosphere – my fav time to click photos. The clouds played hide and seek – which made the mountains look so much textured. So this time I had to resort to using my B+W Kaesemann Polarizer and UV Haze filters to tone down the light. I had rented a super wide angle lens and used it almost exclusively (except for a few shots like the one below, which was shot with my 70-200VR). I have shot tonnes of photos – and got to process only a handfull of them. More to come in the next few weeks.

Not a Postcard

Hema